![]() Feel free to have a go at it if time Thanks once again. it has worked wonders for me on the previous templates i have made, but im on my 6th board now and am designing a performance fish, and i cant seem to make a. I have attached tflite file, kmodel file, images for testing and expected result all in attachment.zip in the original post. User is attempting to remove too much material, causing excessive vertical force on the spindle. ![]() The kmodel gives expected result when using ncc infer but the same kmodel on k210 seems to go way off even though the images I feed to it are the same! I am not sure what preprocessing happens during ncc infer or what is causing the issue on the chip. So I guess it is running at normal speed? I am using sipeed maix bit without any modification.But I guess this is not causing the issue anyway as results during ncc infer are perfect. I assumed that -inpu-mean defaults to 0 hence skipped it.I did try loading from camera but the result were similar (1.0, very large value) and I couldn't verify it in any way, so I stuck to feeding the same images that I had used to verify kmodel using ncc infer on PC.With the latest market leading technology we will be able to provide you with the best quality shaping machine in the world today. We have all the the solutions for your shaping needs. The images I am using are already 200x200 grayscale images. With over a decade of experience and expertise in the industry. It wasn't producing the proper result in any of it. Carbon fiber is accurately applied, using lasers, top and bottom. Finished shaped and fine tuned by hand to perfection. Since it can be used with so many types of systems. Stringer-less EPS blank, precisely pre-shaped by AKU-Shaper, CNC. 8 Compatibility The Aku shaper is compatible with Windows, MAC OS X, and GNU Linux operating systems. I have tried it on 0.5.0_220, 0.5.0_125, 0.6.0, 0.6.1 all of it "minimum with kmodel4 support". LightSpeed Light and exceptionally fast technology, allowing you to take your small wave and everyday surfing to new levels of speed and Pro-formance. ![]() (compare output_2 for 1.jpg at the beginning and at the end) Oddly what I noticed was for the same image the result for output_2 is different for different runs. It seems to be wrong in a similar way as the earlier approach - output_1 always "1.0" and output_2 some very large value. Sadly, I did not get the correct results. What you mentioned makes sense and tried it out right now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |